© 2012 Jacco

Composition decomposed, part 2

Personally, I find this the least favourite of my WPPD shots. I included it here for completeness, and of course to hear your opinion. Least favourite? Interesting? None of the above?

This image works fine in the (unintended) double exposure, but by itself, it doesn’t do much for me.


  1. Posted May 30, 2012 at 12:54 | #

    Yeah, the double exposure best.

    • Posted May 30, 2012 at 13:02 | #

      Okay, we agree! There’s a few more shots on the way, and then you can pick your favourite of all of the WWPD 2012 shots. Let’s see… I think there’s four more to come (but I may decide otherwise).

  2. Posted June 3, 2012 at 00:02 | #

    I do not know, but I think this is great and better than double exposure. It has a different quality, it is more real but in the realise is this one better.

    • Posted June 3, 2012 at 01:47 | #

      Interesting, Richo, and that’s why I’m glad I posted the decomposition. When I took this shot, I took it for a reason. Because I thought it would (or could?) be good, interesting, whatever. But when I got the developed roll and photos back, I thought there just isn’t enough shadow detail and the reds in the trees are really over the top. But that’s technique talking. Emotion is another thing. And you have just made me look again at this shot, and a bit longer, and then some more… well, the composition is nice (if I may say so), and despite the lack of shadow detail, it is starting to grow on me…

      Yes… I’m glad I posted this shot, thanks for your comment!

      P.S.: about the beer, keep it cold and I’ll meet with you another time, OK? “Another time”, but certainly in 2012!

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>