shuttr.net

6 Comments

1. 
   Posted April 19, 2011 at 11:09 | #

   Hmmm, like the purple, but I am disappointed by the (lack of) green.
   Is this typical for E100G or just a result of scanning?

   How does it look on the light table?

   Reply
2. 
   Posted April 19, 2011 at 11:16 | #

   Or it could be a result of the colour-impaired vision of the photographer in question.
   ("Green? Where?")

   I should show it on the lighttable, to be viewed and rated by an impartial person.

   One thing, though, I didn't mention it is expired E100G (best before 2006). So, that could be a factor as well.

   Reply
3. 
   Posted April 19, 2011 at 14:54 | #

   He, jij had wel net dat contrasterende bloemetje er tussen staan. Ik niet: http://files.erwinwendy.nl/img_0310.jpg
   Daarnaast: ik vind hem wat flets en had denk ik de blaadjes naast het gele bloempje weggehaald (irl niet in photoshop)

   Reply
4. 
   Posted April 19, 2011 at 15:05 | #

   Goeie! Wel dat gele bloemetje, ja.

   Enneh… toen ik het resultaat zag dacht ik ook: waarom heb ik dat blad niet weggehaald? Of erger nog, waarom is het me niet opgevallen?

   Reply
5. 
   Posted April 19, 2011 at 15:22 | #

   Aha!

   Looking at erwin's picture, the difference in saturation is huge.
   Some of that may be expected as analogue – digital difference but this is very big.

   Oh well…

   Reply
6. 
   Posted April 19, 2011 at 15:47 | #

   Difference is big yes. Don't know if I've done some extra saturation…

   Reply